Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kaspar V ae62e5fa53
Fix/remove calling private method with send in model (#22951)
* fix(status): remove send usage for private unlink_from_conversations

- make unlink_from_conversations public method
- rename unlink_from_conversations to unlink_from_conversations!
- fix send call on private method in statuses_vacuum and batched_remove_status_service

* fix(feeds_vacuum): replace find_in_batches with in_batches

because active record query results should be a little more efficient than
itterating with map and each. Postgres can grasp such lists of ids much quicker
than ruby can.
Will probably make allmost no difference, but cannot hurt either.
2023-01-11 21:57:24 +01:00
Kaspar V 47f0d7021e
refactor(vacuum statuses): reduce amount of db queries and load for each query - improve performance (#21487)
* refactor(statuses_vacuum): remove dead code - unused

Method is not called inside class and private.
Clean up dead code.

* refactor(statuses_vacuum): make retention_period present test explicit

This private method only hides functionality.
It is best practice to be as explicit as possible.

* refactor(statuses_vacuum): improve query performance

- fix statuses_scope having sub-select for Account.remote scope by
  `joins(:account).merge(Account.remote)`
- fix statuses_scope unnecessary use of `Status.arel_table[:id].lt`
  because it is inexplicit, bad practice and even slower than normal
  `.where('statuses.id < ?'`
- fix statuses_scope remove select(:id, :visibility) for having reusable
  active record query batches (no re queries)
- fix vacuum_statuses! to use in_batches instead of find_in_batches,
  because in_batches delivers a full blown active record query result,
  in stead of an array - no requeries necessary
- send(:unlink_from_conversations) not to perform another db query, but
  reuse the in_batches result instead.
- remove now obsolete remove_from_account_conversations method
- remove_from_search_index uses array of ids, instead of mapping
  the ids from an array - this should be more efficient
- use the in_batches scope to call delete_all, instead of running
  another db query for this - because it is again more efficient
- add TODO comment for calling models private method with send

* refactor(status): simplify unlink_from_conversations

- add `has_many through:` relation mentioned_accounts
- use model scope local instead of method call `Status#local?`
- more readable add account to inbox_owners when account.local?

* refactor(status): searchable_by way less sub selects

These queries all included a sub-select. Doing the same with a joins
should be more efficient.
Since this method does 5 such queries, this should be significant,
since it technically halves the query count.

This is how it was:

```ruby
[3] pry(main)> Status.first.mentions.where(account: Account.local, silent: false).explain
  Status Load (1.6ms)  SELECT "statuses".* FROM "statuses" WHERE "statuses"."deleted_at" IS NULL ORDER BY "statuses"."id" DESC LIMIT $1  [["LIMIT", 1]]
  Mention Load (1.5ms)  SELECT "mentions".* FROM "mentions" WHERE "mentions"."status_id" = $1 AND "mentions"."account_id" IN (SELECT "accounts"."id" FROM "accounts" WHERE "accounts"."domain" IS NULL) AND "mentions"."silent" = $2  [["status_id", 109382923142288414], ["silent", false]]
=> EXPLAIN for: SELECT "mentions".* FROM "mentions" WHERE "mentions"."status_id" = $1 AND "mentions"."account_id" IN (SELECT "accounts"."id" FROM "accounts" WHERE "accounts"."domain" IS NULL) AND "mentions"."silent" = $2 [["status_id", 109382923142288414], ["silent", false]]
                                                    QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Nested Loop  (cost=0.15..23.08 rows=1 width=41)
   ->  Seq Scan on accounts  (cost=0.00..10.90 rows=1 width=8)
         Filter: (domain IS NULL)
   ->  Index Scan using index_mentions_on_account_id_and_status_id on mentions  (cost=0.15..8.17 rows=1 width=41)
         Index Cond: ((account_id = accounts.id) AND (status_id = '109382923142288414'::bigint))
         Filter: (NOT silent)
(6 rows)
```

This is how it is with this change:

```ruby
[4] pry(main)> Status.first.mentions.joins(:account).merge(Account.local).active.explain
  Status Load (1.7ms)  SELECT "statuses".* FROM "statuses" WHERE "statuses"."deleted_at" IS NULL ORDER BY "statuses"."id" DESC LIMIT $1  [["LIMIT", 1]]
  Mention Load (0.7ms)  SELECT "mentions".* FROM "mentions" INNER JOIN "accounts" ON "accounts"."id" = "mentions"."account_id" WHERE "mentions"."status_id" = $1 AND "accounts"."domain" IS NULL AND "mentions"."silent" = $2  [["status_id", 109382923142288414], ["silent", false]]
=> EXPLAIN for: SELECT "mentions".* FROM "mentions" INNER JOIN "accounts" ON "accounts"."id" = "mentions"."account_id" WHERE "mentions"."status_id" = $1 AND "accounts"."domain" IS NULL AND "mentions"."silent" = $2 [["status_id", 109382923142288414], ["silent", false]]
                                                    QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Nested Loop  (cost=0.15..23.08 rows=1 width=41)
   ->  Seq Scan on accounts  (cost=0.00..10.90 rows=1 width=8)
         Filter: (domain IS NULL)
   ->  Index Scan using index_mentions_on_account_id_and_status_id on mentions  (cost=0.15..8.17 rows=1 width=41)
         Index Cond: ((account_id = accounts.id) AND (status_id = '109382923142288414'::bigint))
         Filter: (NOT silent)
(6 rows)
```
2022-11-27 20:41:18 +01:00
Eugen Rochko 5c9abdeff1
Add retention policy for cached content and media (#19232) 2022-09-27 03:08:19 +02:00