List of known FreeType 2 Bugs ----------------------------- "Identifier" is a unique string used to uniquely identify the bug A more complete description of the bug is found below the table of opened bugs.. "Date" is the date where the bug was first reported or entered in this document. Dates are in _european_ format, i.e day/month/year "Opened By" is the name of the people who first spotted the bug. Note that we can use abbreviations here, like: "David" for David Turner "Werner" for Werner Lemberg etc.. "Reproducable" indicates wether the bug could be reproduced by the development team or not (it can be specific to a given platform), wether it always happen, or only sporadically, etc.. I. Opened bugs: =============== Identifier Date Opened by Reproducable ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NO-CID-CMAPS 13-09-2001 David always AUTOHINT-NO-SBITS 13-09-2001 David always BAD-TT-RENDERING 12-09-2001 Paul Pedriana ? BAD-THIN-LINES 13-09-2001 David ? --------------------END-OF-OPENED-BUGS-TABLE---------------------------------- II. Table of closed bugs: ========================= Identifier Date Closed by Closure date ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BAD-TTNAMEID.H 12-09-2001 Antoine N/A --------------------END-OF-CLOSED-BUGS-TABLE---------------------------------- II. Bug descriptions: ===================== NO-CID-CMAPS: Not exactly a bug, but the CFF font driver doesn't build a Unicode charmap from the content of font files, which prevents efficiently using fonts in this format.. BAD-TTNAMEID.H the file "ttnameid.h" contains various constant macro definitions corresponding to important values defined by the TrueType specification. Joe Man reports that: According to the information from TrueType v1.66 Platform ID = 3 (Microsoft) the Encoding ID of GB2312 = 4 the Encoding ID of big5 = 3 However, I have found that in ttnameid.h TT_MS_ID_GB2312 = 3 TT_MS_ID_BIG_5 = 4 Which one is correct? Antoine replied that this was a bug in the TT 1.66 specification, and that FreeType followed the most recent TrueType/OpenType specification here !! AUTOHINT-SBITS when trying to load a glyph, with the auto-hinter activated (i.e. when using FT_LOAD_FORCE_AUTOHINT, or when the font driver doesn't provide its own hinter), embedded bitmaps are _never_ loaded, unlike the default behaviour described by the API specification. this seems to be a bug in FT_Load_Glyph, but there is no way to solve it efficiently without making a few important internal changes to the library's design (more importantly, to the font driver interface) BAD-TT-RENDERING according to Paul Pedriana , there is a rather important difference between the rendering of TrueType-hinted glyphs of current FT2 and old betas.. Tests and comparisons show a _major_ discrepancy of monochrome truetype bytecode-hinted glyphs !! Something seems to be really fucked here !! BAD-THIN-LINES it seems that the anti-aliased renderer in FreeType has problems rendering extremely thin straight lines correctly, at least when using the FT_Outline_Render functions..