forked from minhngoc25a/freetype2
[smooth] Sub-banding protocol revision.
Rasterization sub-banding is utilized at large sizes while using rather small fixed memory pool. Indeed it is possible to make an educated guess how much memory is necessary at a given size for a given glyph. It turns out that, for large majority of European glyphs, you should store about 8 times more boundary pixels than their height. Or, vice versa, if your memory pool can hold 800 pixels the band height should be 100 and you should sub-band anything larger than that. Should you still run out of memory, FreeType bisects the band but you have wasted some time. This is what has been implemented in FreeType since the beginning. It was overlooked, however, that the top band could grow to twice the default band size leading to unnecessary memory overflows there. This commit fixes that. Now the bands are distributed more evenly and cannot exceed the default size. Now the magic number 8 is really suitable for rather simple European scripts. For complex Chinese logograms the magic number should be 13 but that is subject for another day. * src/smooth/ftgrays.c (gray_convert_glyph): Revise sub-banding protocol.
This commit is contained in:
parent
783cbcd67d
commit
4a2f8f1faf
27
ChangeLog
27
ChangeLog
|
@ -1,3 +1,30 @@
|
|||
2016-07-08 Alexei Podtelezhnikov <apodtele@gmail.com>
|
||||
|
||||
[smooth] Sub-banding protocol revision.
|
||||
|
||||
Rasterization sub-banding is utilized at large sizes while using
|
||||
rather small fixed memory pool. Indeed it is possible to make an
|
||||
educated guess how much memory is necessary at a given size for a
|
||||
given glyph. It turns out that, for large majority of European glyphs,
|
||||
you should store about 8 times more boundary pixels than their height.
|
||||
Or, vice versa, if your memory pool can hold 800 pixels the band
|
||||
height should be 100 and you should sub-band anything larger than
|
||||
that. Should you still run out of memory, FreeType bisects the band
|
||||
but you have wasted some time. This is what has been implemented in
|
||||
FreeType since the beginning.
|
||||
|
||||
It was overlooked, however, that the top band could grow to twice the
|
||||
default band size leading to unnecessary memory overflows there. This
|
||||
commit fixes that. Now the bands are distributed more evenly and
|
||||
cannot exceed the default size.
|
||||
|
||||
Now the magic number 8 is really suitable for rather simple European
|
||||
scripts. For complex Chinese logograms the magic number should be 13
|
||||
but that is subject for another day.
|
||||
|
||||
* src/smooth/ftgrays.c (gray_convert_glyph): Revise sub-banding
|
||||
protocol.
|
||||
|
||||
2016-07-07 suzuki toshiya <mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp>
|
||||
|
||||
[mac] Fix Savannah bug #48417.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1893,27 +1893,28 @@ typedef ptrdiff_t FT_PtrDist;
|
|||
gray_convert_glyph( RAS_ARG )
|
||||
{
|
||||
TCell buffer[FT_MAX_GRAY_POOL];
|
||||
const int band_size = FT_MAX_GRAY_POOL / 8;
|
||||
gray_TBand bands[32];
|
||||
gray_TBand* band;
|
||||
int n, num_bands;
|
||||
TCoord band_size = FT_MAX_GRAY_POOL / 8;
|
||||
int num_bands;
|
||||
TCoord min, max, max_y;
|
||||
gray_TBand bands[32]; /* enough to accommodate bisections */
|
||||
gray_TBand* band;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/* set up vertical bands */
|
||||
num_bands = (int)( ( ras.max_ey - ras.min_ey ) / band_size );
|
||||
if ( num_bands == 0 )
|
||||
num_bands = 1;
|
||||
if ( num_bands >= 39 )
|
||||
num_bands = 39;
|
||||
if ( ras.count_ey > band_size )
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* two divisions rounded up */
|
||||
num_bands = (int)( ( ras.count_ey + band_size - 1) / band_size );
|
||||
band_size = ( ras.count_ey + num_bands - 1 ) / num_bands;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
min = ras.min_ey;
|
||||
max_y = ras.max_ey;
|
||||
|
||||
for ( n = 0; n < num_bands; n++, min = max )
|
||||
for (; min < max_y; min = max )
|
||||
{
|
||||
max = min + band_size;
|
||||
if ( n == num_bands - 1 || max > max_y )
|
||||
if ( max > max_y )
|
||||
max = max_y;
|
||||
|
||||
bands[0].min = min;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue