fixes bug where priorities where lost when force-rechecking.

This commit is contained in:
Arvid Norberg 2008-08-25 22:32:50 +00:00
parent 66ac9fe718
commit e9045cc1df
4 changed files with 41 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ namespace libtorrent
void we_have(int index);
void we_dont_have(int index);
// sets all pieces to dont-have
void init(int blocks_per_piece, int total_num_blocks);
int num_pieces() const { return int(m_piece_map.size()); }

View File

@ -82,6 +82,18 @@ namespace libtorrent
m_piece_map.resize((total_num_blocks + blocks_per_piece-1) / blocks_per_piece
, piece_pos(0, 0));
m_num_filtered += m_num_have_filtered;
m_num_have_filtered = 0;
m_num_have = 0;
m_dirty = true;
for (std::vector<piece_pos>::iterator i = m_piece_map.begin()
, end(m_piece_map.end()); i != end; ++i)
{
i->peer_count = 0;
i->downloading = 0;
i->index = 0;
}
// the piece index is stored in 20 bits, which limits the allowed
// number of pieces somewhat
if (m_piece_map.size() >= piece_pos::we_have_index)
@ -1074,7 +1086,7 @@ namespace libtorrent
if (new_piece_priority == int(p.piece_priority)) return false;
int prev_priority = p.priority(this);
TORRENT_ASSERT(prev_priority < int(m_priority_boundries.size()));
TORRENT_ASSERT(m_dirty | prev_priority < int(m_priority_boundries.size()));
bool ret = false;
if (new_piece_priority == piece_pos::filter_priority
@ -1101,8 +1113,6 @@ namespace libtorrent
if (prev_priority == new_priority) return ret;
TORRENT_ASSERT(prev_priority < int(m_priority_boundries.size()));
if (m_dirty) return ret;
if (prev_priority == -1)
{

View File

@ -667,7 +667,6 @@ namespace libtorrent
, m_save_path, m_ses.m_files, m_ses.m_disk_thread, m_storage_constructor
, m_storage_mode);
m_storage = m_owning_storage.get();
m_picker.reset(new piece_picker);
m_picker->init(m_torrent_file->piece_length() / m_block_size
, int((m_torrent_file->total_size()+m_block_size-1)/m_block_size));
// assume that we don't have anything

View File

@ -278,6 +278,33 @@ int test_main()
TEST_CHECK(int(picked.size()) > 0);
TEST_CHECK(picked.front().piece_index == 1);
// ========================================================
// make sure init preserves priorities
print_title("test init");
p = setup_picker("1111111", " ", "1111111", "");
TEST_CHECK(p->num_filtered() == 0);
TEST_CHECK(p->num_have_filtered() == 0);
TEST_CHECK(p->num_have() == 0);
p->set_piece_priority(0, 0);
TEST_CHECK(p->num_filtered() == 1);
TEST_CHECK(p->num_have_filtered() == 0);
TEST_CHECK(p->num_have() == 0);
p->we_have(0);
TEST_CHECK(p->num_filtered() == 0);
TEST_CHECK(p->num_have_filtered() == 1);
TEST_CHECK(p->num_have() == 1);
p->init(blocks_per_piece, blocks_per_piece * 7);
TEST_CHECK(p->piece_priority(0) == 0);
TEST_CHECK(p->num_filtered() == 1);
TEST_CHECK(p->num_have_filtered() == 0);
TEST_CHECK(p->num_have() == 0);
// ========================================================
// make sure requested blocks aren't picked