Merge pull request #117 from thomas-yuan/master

Fix bug caused by RP #96.
This commit is contained in:
Arvid Norberg 2015-08-31 23:49:08 -04:00
commit 7285520521
5 changed files with 21 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ struct observer : boost::noncopyable
bool has_short_timeout() const { return (flags & flag_short_timeout) != 0; }
// this is called when no reply has been received within
// some timeout
// some timeout, or a reply with incorrect format.
virtual void timeout();
// if this is called the destructor should

View File

@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ void find_data_observer::reply(msg const& m)
get_observer()->log(dht_logger::traversal, "[%p] missing response dict"
, static_cast<void*>(algorithm()));
#endif
timeout();
return;
}
@ -66,6 +67,7 @@ void find_data_observer::reply(msg const& m)
get_observer()->log(dht_logger::traversal, "[%p] invalid id in response"
, static_cast<void*>(algorithm()));
#endif
timeout();
return;
}
bdecode_node token = r.dict_find_string("token");

View File

@ -271,6 +271,7 @@ void get_item_observer::reply(msg const& m)
get_observer()->log(dht_logger::traversal, "[%p] missing response dict"
, static_cast<void*>(algorithm()));
#endif
timeout();
return;
}
@ -286,7 +287,10 @@ void get_item_observer::reply(msg const& m)
if (q)
seq = q.int_value();
else if (pk && sig)
{
timeout();
return;
}
bdecode_node v = r.dict_find("v");
if (v)

View File

@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ void get_peers_observer::reply(msg const& m)
get_observer()->log(dht_logger::traversal, "[%p] missing response dict"
, static_cast<void*>(algorithm()));
#endif
timeout();
return;
}
@ -312,6 +313,7 @@ void obfuscated_get_peers_observer::reply(msg const& m)
get_observer()->log(dht_logger::traversal, "[%p] missing response dict"
, static_cast<void*>(algorithm()));
#endif
timeout();
return;
}
@ -322,6 +324,7 @@ void obfuscated_get_peers_observer::reply(msg const& m)
get_observer()->log(dht_logger::traversal, "[%p] invalid id in response"
, static_cast<void*>(algorithm()));
#endif
timeout();
return;
}

View File

@ -141,8 +141,6 @@ void observer::short_timeout()
m_algorithm->failed(observer_ptr(this), traversal_algorithm::short_timeout);
}
// this is called when no reply has been received within
// some timeout
void observer::timeout()
{
if (flags & flag_done) return;
@ -302,14 +300,23 @@ bool rpc_manager::incoming(msg const& m, node_id* id
if (m.message.dict_find_string_value("y") == "e")
{
// it's an error.
// It's an error.
#ifndef TORRENT_DISABLE_LOGGING
bdecode_node err_ent = m.message.dict_find("e");
TORRENT_ASSERT(err_ent);
m_log->log(dht_logger::rpc_manager, "reply with error from %s: %s"
, print_endpoint(m.addr).c_str(), err_ent.list_string_value_at(1).c_str());
#endif
o->reply(m);
// Logically, we should call o->reply(m) since we get a reply.
// a reply could be "response" or "error", here the reply is an "error".
// if the reply is an "error", basically the observer could/will
// do nothing with it, especially when observer::reply() is intended to
// handle a "response", not an "error".
// A "response" should somehow call algorithm->finished(), and an error/timeout
// should call algorithm->failed(). From this point of view,
// we should call o->timeout() instead of o->reply(m) because o->reply()
// will call algorithm->finished().
o->timeout();
return false;
}