204 lines
8.9 KiB
ReStructuredText
204 lines
8.9 KiB
ReStructuredText
|
=================
|
||
|
libtorrent manual
|
||
|
=================
|
||
|
|
||
|
:Author: Arvid Norberg, arvid@rasterbar.com
|
||
|
:Version: 0.15.0
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. contents:: Table of contents
|
||
|
:depth: 2
|
||
|
:backlinks: none
|
||
|
|
||
|
tuning libtorrent
|
||
|
=================
|
||
|
|
||
|
libtorrent expose most constants used in the bittorrent engine for
|
||
|
customization through the ``session_settings``. This makes it possible to
|
||
|
test and tweak the parameters for certain algorithms to make a client
|
||
|
that fits a wide range of needs. From low memory embedded devices to
|
||
|
servers seeding thousands of torrents. The default settings in libtorrent
|
||
|
are tuned for an end-user bittorrent client running on a normal desktop
|
||
|
computer.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This document describes techniques to benchmark libtorrent performance
|
||
|
and how parameters are likely to affect it.
|
||
|
|
||
|
reducing memory footprint
|
||
|
=========================
|
||
|
|
||
|
These are things you can do to reduce the memory footprint of libtorrent. You get
|
||
|
some of this by basing your default ``session_settings`` on the ``min_memory_usage()``
|
||
|
setting preset function.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Keep in mind that lowering memory usage will affect performance, always profile
|
||
|
and benchmark your settings to determine if it's worth the trade-off.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The typical buffer usage of libtorrent, for a single download, with the cache
|
||
|
size set to 256 blocks (256 * 16 kiB = 4 MiB) is::
|
||
|
|
||
|
read cache: 149.5 (2392 kiB)
|
||
|
write cache: 89.5 (1432 kiB)
|
||
|
receive buffers: 6.5 (104 kiB)
|
||
|
send buffers: 4 (64 kiB)
|
||
|
hash temp: 0.5 (8 kiB)
|
||
|
|
||
|
The receive buffers is proportional to the number of connections we make, and is
|
||
|
limited by the total number of connections in the session (default is 200).
|
||
|
|
||
|
The send buffers is proportional to the number of upload slots that are allowed
|
||
|
in the session. The default is auto configured based on the observed upload rate.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The read and write cache can be controlled (see section below).
|
||
|
|
||
|
The "hash temp" entry size depends on whether or not hashing is optimized for
|
||
|
speed or memory usage. In this test run it was optimized for memory usage.
|
||
|
|
||
|
disable disk cache
|
||
|
------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
The bulk of the memory libtorrent will use is used for the disk cache. To save
|
||
|
the absolute most amount of memory, you can disable the the cache by setting
|
||
|
``session_settings::cache_size`` to 0. You might want to consider using the cache
|
||
|
but just disable caching read operations. You do this by settings
|
||
|
``session_settings::use_read_cache`` to false. This is the main factor in how much
|
||
|
memory will be used by the client. Keep in mind that you will degrade performance
|
||
|
by disabling the cache. You should benchmark the disk access in order to make an
|
||
|
informed trade-off.
|
||
|
|
||
|
remove torrents
|
||
|
---------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
Torrents that have been added to libtorrent will inevitably use up memory, event
|
||
|
when it's paused. A paused torrent will not use any peer connection objects or
|
||
|
any send or receive buffers though. Any added torrent holds the entire .torrent
|
||
|
file in memory, it also remembers the entire list of peers that it's heard about
|
||
|
(which can be fairly long unless it's capped). It also retains information about
|
||
|
which blocks and pieces we have on disk, which can be significant for torrents
|
||
|
with many pieces.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you need to minimize the memory footprint, consider removing torrents from
|
||
|
the session rather than pausing them. This will likely only make a difference
|
||
|
when you have a very large number of torrents in a session.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The downside of removing them is that they will no longer be auto-managed. Paused
|
||
|
auto managed torrents are scraped periodically, to determine which torrents are
|
||
|
in the greatest need of seeding, and libtorrent will prioritize to seed those.
|
||
|
|
||
|
socket buffer sizes
|
||
|
-------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
You can make libtorrent explicitly set the kernel buffer sizes of all its peer
|
||
|
sockets. If you set this to a low number, you may see reduced throughput, especially
|
||
|
for high latency connections. It is however an oportunity to save memory per
|
||
|
connection, and might be worth considering if you have a very large number of
|
||
|
peer connections. This memory will not be visible in your process, this sets
|
||
|
the amount of kernel memory is used for your sockets.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Change this by setting ``session_settings::recv_socket_buffer_size`` and
|
||
|
``session_settings::send_socket_buffer_size``.
|
||
|
|
||
|
peer list size
|
||
|
--------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
The default maximum for the peer list is 4000 peers. For IPv4 peers, each peer
|
||
|
entry uses 32 bytes, which ends up using 128 kB per torrent. If seeding 4 popular
|
||
|
torrents, the peer lists alone uses about half a megabyte.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The default limit is the same for paused torrents as well, so if you have a
|
||
|
large number of paused torrents (that are popular) it will be even more
|
||
|
significant.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you're short of memory, you should consider lowering the limit. 500 is probably
|
||
|
enough. You can do this by setting ``session_settings::max_peerlist_size`` to
|
||
|
the max number of peers you want in the torrent's peer list.
|
||
|
|
||
|
You should also lower the same limit but for paused torrents. It might even make sense
|
||
|
to set that even lower, since you only need a few peers to start up while waiting
|
||
|
for the tracker and DHT to give you fresh ones. The max peer list size for paused
|
||
|
torrents is set by ``session_settings::max_paused_peerlist_size``.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The drawback of lowering this number is that if you end up in a position where
|
||
|
the tracker is down for an extended period of time, your only hope of finding live
|
||
|
peers is to go through your list of all peers you've ever seen. Having a large
|
||
|
peer list will also help increase performance when starting up, since the torrent
|
||
|
can start connecting to peers in parallel with connecting to the tracker.
|
||
|
|
||
|
send buffer watermark
|
||
|
---------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
The send buffer watermark controls when libtorrent will ask the disk I/O thread
|
||
|
to read blocks from disk, and append it to a peer's send buffer.
|
||
|
|
||
|
When the send buffer has fewer than or equal number of bytes as
|
||
|
``session_settings::send_buffer_watermark``, the peer will ask the disk I/O thread
|
||
|
for more data to send. The trade-off here is between wasting memory by having too
|
||
|
much data in the send buffer, and hurting send rate by starving out the socket,
|
||
|
waiting for the disk read operation to complete.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If your main objective is memory usage and you're not concerned about being able
|
||
|
to achieve high send rates, you can set the watermark to 9 bytes. This will guarantee
|
||
|
that no more than a single (16 kiB) block will be on the send buffer at a time, for
|
||
|
all peers. This is the least amount of memory possible for the send buffer.
|
||
|
|
||
|
You should benchmark your max send rate when adjusting this setting. If you have
|
||
|
a very fast disk, you are less likely see a performance hit.
|
||
|
|
||
|
optimize hashing for memory usage
|
||
|
---------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
When libtorrent is doing hash checks of a file, or when it re-reads a piece that
|
||
|
was just completed to verify its hash, there are two options. The default one
|
||
|
is optimized for speed, which allocates buffers for the entire piece, reads in
|
||
|
the whole piece in one read call, then hashes it.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The second option is to optimize for memory usage instead, where a single buffer
|
||
|
is allocated, and the piece is read one block at a time, hashing it as each
|
||
|
block is read from the file. For low memory environments, this latter approach
|
||
|
is recommended. Change this by settings ``session_settings::optimize_hashing_for_speed``
|
||
|
to false. This will significantly reduce peak memory usage, especially for
|
||
|
torrents with very large pieces.
|
||
|
|
||
|
reduce executable size
|
||
|
----------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
Compilers generally add a significant number of bytes to executables that make use
|
||
|
of C++ exceptions. By disabling exceptions (-fno-exceptions on GCC), you can
|
||
|
reduce the executable size with up to 45%.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Also make sure to optimize for size when compiling.
|
||
|
|
||
|
play nice with the disk
|
||
|
=======================
|
||
|
|
||
|
When checking a torrent, libtorrent will try to read as fast as possible from the disk.
|
||
|
The only thing that might hold it back is a CPU that is slow at calculating SHA-1 hashes,
|
||
|
but typically the file checking is limited by disk read speed. Most operating systems
|
||
|
today do not prioritize disk access based on the importance of the operation, this means
|
||
|
that checking a torrent might delay other disk accesses, such as virtual memory swapping
|
||
|
or just loading file by other (interactive) applications.
|
||
|
|
||
|
In order to play nicer with the disk, and leave some spare time for it to service other
|
||
|
processes that might be of higher importance to the end-user, you can introduce a sleep
|
||
|
between the disc accesses. This is a direct tradeoff between how fast you can check a
|
||
|
torrent and how soft you will hit the disk.
|
||
|
|
||
|
You control this by setting the ``session_settings::file_checks_delay_per_block`` to greater
|
||
|
than zero. This number is the number of milliseconds to sleep between each read of 16 kiB.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The sleeps are not necessarily in between each 16 kiB block (it might be read in larger chunks),
|
||
|
but the number will be multiplied by the number of blocks that were read, to maintain the
|
||
|
same semantics.
|
||
|
|
||
|
benchmarking
|
||
|
============
|
||
|
|
||
|
disk cache stats
|
||
|
----------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
disk access stats
|
||
|
-----------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
session stats
|
||
|
-------------
|
||
|
|