this is probably bad, please sanity check

This commit is contained in:
John McLear 2013-02-18 00:36:31 +00:00
parent 11a8295150
commit 6e46a53288
1 changed files with 6 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -926,10 +926,15 @@ function handleClientReady(client, message)
})
//If this is a reconnect, we don't have to send the client the ClientVars again
if(message.reconnect == "not accepting true here makes everything work fine but it also sends whole atext which is bad")
//if(message.reconnect == "not accepting true here makes everything work fine but it also sends whole atext which is bad")
if(message.reconnect == true)
{
//Save the revision in sessioninfos, we take the revision from the info the client send to us
sessioninfos[client.id].rev = message.client_rev;
//Join the pad and start receiving updates
client.join(padIds.padId);
//Save the current revision in sessioninfos, should be the same as in clientVars
sessioninfos[client.id].rev = pad.getHeadRevisionNumber(); // I'm not sure this is a great idea here
}
//This is a normal first connect
else