free
/
freedomboneeee
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Add no hostile communication to the code of conduct

This commit is contained in:
Bob Mottram 2018-06-19 15:37:47 +01:00
parent 9fd79e14af
commit db15ce22b2
3 changed files with 40 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
code-of-conduct.md
View File

@ -36,6 +36,16 @@ No stalking, unwanted personal attention, or unwelcome revealing or speculating
In cases of sincere, good-faith curiosity about someone’s experience or identity, ask politely in a manner such that they will feel free to decline the request. In cases of sincere, good-faith curiosity about someone’s experience or identity, ask politely in a manner such that they will feel free to decline the request.
## No hostile communication
No insults, harassment, condescension, ad hominem, threats, or other intimidation.
Condescension means treating others as inferior. Subtle condescension still violates the Code of Conduct even if not blatantly demeaning.
No stereotyping of or promoting prejudice or discrimination against particular groups or classes of people.
In cases where criticism of ideology or culture remains on-topic, respectfully discuss the ideas.
## In case of problems ## In case of problems
While this code of conduct should be adhered to by participants, we recognize that sometimes people may have a bad day, or be unaware of some of the guidelines in this code of conduct. When that happens, you may reply to them and point out this code of conduct. Such messages may be in public or in private, whatever is most appropriate. However, regardless of whether the message is public or not, it should still adhere to the relevant parts of this code of conduct; in particular, it should not be abusive or disrespectful. Assume good faith; it is more likely that participants are unaware of their bad behaviour than that they intentionally try to degrade the quality of the discussion. While this code of conduct should be adhered to by participants, we recognize that sometimes people may have a bad day, or be unaware of some of the guidelines in this code of conduct. When that happens, you may reply to them and point out this code of conduct. Such messages may be in public or in private, whatever is most appropriate. However, regardless of whether the message is public or not, it should still adhere to the relevant parts of this code of conduct; in particular, it should not be abusive or disrespectful. Assume good faith; it is more likely that participants are unaware of their bad behaviour than that they intentionally try to degrade the quality of the discussion.

8
doc/EN/codeofconduct.org
View File

@ -43,6 +43,14 @@ Posting of adverts or other off-topic content in Matrix/XMPP or other public sys
No stalking, unwanted personal attention, or unwelcome revealing or speculating about personal details of others. No stalking, unwanted personal attention, or unwelcome revealing or speculating about personal details of others.
In cases of sincere, good-faith curiosity about someone’s experience or identity, ask politely in a manner such that they will feel free to decline the request. In cases of sincere, good-faith curiosity about someone’s experience or identity, ask politely in a manner such that they will feel free to decline the request.
* No hostile communication
No insults, harassment, condescension, ad hominem, threats, or other intimidation.
Condescension means treating others as inferior. Subtle condescension still violates the Code of Conduct even if not blatantly demeaning.
No stereotyping of or promoting prejudice or discrimination against particular groups or classes of people.
In cases where criticism of ideology or culture remains on-topic, respectfully discuss the ideas.
* In case of problems * In case of problems
While this code of conduct should be adhered to by participants, we recognize that sometimes people may have a bad day, or be unaware of some of the guidelines in this code of conduct. When that happens, you may reply to them and point out this code of conduct. Such messages may be in public or in private, whatever is most appropriate. However, regardless of whether the message is public or not, it should still adhere to the relevant parts of this code of conduct; in particular, it should not be abusive or disrespectful. Assume good faith; it is more likely that participants are unaware of their bad behaviour than that they intentionally try to degrade the quality of the discussion. While this code of conduct should be adhered to by participants, we recognize that sometimes people may have a bad day, or be unaware of some of the guidelines in this code of conduct. When that happens, you may reply to them and point out this code of conduct. Such messages may be in public or in private, whatever is most appropriate. However, regardless of whether the message is public or not, it should still adhere to the relevant parts of this code of conduct; in particular, it should not be abusive or disrespectful. Assume good faith; it is more likely that participants are unaware of their bad behaviour than that they intentionally try to degrade the quality of the discussion.

24
website/EN/codeofconduct.html
View File

@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en">
<head> <head>
<title></title> <title></title>
<!-- 2018-06-19 Tue 15:30 --> <!-- 2018-06-19 Tue 15:37 -->
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" /> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" />
<meta name="generator" content="Org-mode" /> <meta name="generator" content="Org-mode" />
<meta name="author" content="Bob Mottram" /> <meta name="author" content="Bob Mottram" />
@ -233,9 +233,29 @@ In cases of sincere, good-faith curiosity about someone’s experience or identi
</div> </div>
</div> </div>
<div id="outline-container-sec-9" class="outline-2"> <div id="outline-container-sec-9" class="outline-2">
<h2 id="sec-9">In case of problems</h2> <h2 id="sec-9">No hostile communication</h2>
<div class="outline-text-2" id="text-9"> <div class="outline-text-2" id="text-9">
<p> <p>
No insults, harassment, condescension, ad hominem, threats, or other intimidation.
</p>
<p>
Condescension means treating others as inferior. Subtle condescension still violates the Code of Conduct even if not blatantly demeaning.
</p>
<p>
No stereotyping of or promoting prejudice or discrimination against particular groups or classes of people.
</p>
<p>
In cases where criticism of ideology or culture remains on-topic, respectfully discuss the ideas.
</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="outline-container-sec-10" class="outline-2">
<h2 id="sec-10">In case of problems</h2>
<div class="outline-text-2" id="text-10">
<p>
While this code of conduct should be adhered to by participants, we recognize that sometimes people may have a bad day, or be unaware of some of the guidelines in this code of conduct. When that happens, you may reply to them and point out this code of conduct. Such messages may be in public or in private, whatever is most appropriate. However, regardless of whether the message is public or not, it should still adhere to the relevant parts of this code of conduct; in particular, it should not be abusive or disrespectful. Assume good faith; it is more likely that participants are unaware of their bad behaviour than that they intentionally try to degrade the quality of the discussion. While this code of conduct should be adhered to by participants, we recognize that sometimes people may have a bad day, or be unaware of some of the guidelines in this code of conduct. When that happens, you may reply to them and point out this code of conduct. Such messages may be in public or in private, whatever is most appropriate. However, regardless of whether the message is public or not, it should still adhere to the relevant parts of this code of conduct; in particular, it should not be abusive or disrespectful. Assume good faith; it is more likely that participants are unaware of their bad behaviour than that they intentionally try to degrade the quality of the discussion.
</p> </p>