From d4204bf3f7fa3d1f1eddb7b9c418de32a7223c52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bob Mottram Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 15:26:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Add no spamming rule to the code of conduct --- code-of-conduct.md | 4 ++++ doc/EN/codeofconduct.org | 2 ++ website/EN/codeofconduct.html | 12 ++++++++++-- 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/code-of-conduct.md b/code-of-conduct.md index 016e04f2..0093f4f3 100644 --- a/code-of-conduct.md +++ b/code-of-conduct.md @@ -26,6 +26,10 @@ Most ways of communication used within Freedombone (eg Matrix/XMPP) allow for pu This applies to messages for help, too; not only is a public support request much more likely to result in an answer to your question, it also makes sure that any inadvertent mistakes made by people answering your question will be more easily detected and corrected. +## No spamming + +Posting of adverts or other off-topic content in Matrix/XMPP or other public systems used by the project will be considered a violation of the code of conduct. + ## In case of problems While this code of conduct should be adhered to by participants, we recognize that sometimes people may have a bad day, or be unaware of some of the guidelines in this code of conduct. When that happens, you may reply to them and point out this code of conduct. Such messages may be in public or in private, whatever is most appropriate. However, regardless of whether the message is public or not, it should still adhere to the relevant parts of this code of conduct; in particular, it should not be abusive or disrespectful. Assume good faith; it is more likely that participants are unaware of their bad behaviour than that they intentionally try to degrade the quality of the discussion. diff --git a/doc/EN/codeofconduct.org b/doc/EN/codeofconduct.org index 2c837783..64476a73 100644 --- a/doc/EN/codeofconduct.org +++ b/doc/EN/codeofconduct.org @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ Most ways of communication used within Freedombone (eg Matrix/XMPP) allow for pu This applies to messages for help, too; not only is a public support request much more likely to result in an answer to your question, it also makes sure that any inadvertent mistakes made by people answering your question will be more easily detected and corrected. +* No spamming +Posting of adverts or other off-topic content in Matrix/XMPP or other public systems used by the project will be considered a violation of the code of conduct. * In case of problems While this code of conduct should be adhered to by participants, we recognize that sometimes people may have a bad day, or be unaware of some of the guidelines in this code of conduct. When that happens, you may reply to them and point out this code of conduct. Such messages may be in public or in private, whatever is most appropriate. However, regardless of whether the message is public or not, it should still adhere to the relevant parts of this code of conduct; in particular, it should not be abusive or disrespectful. Assume good faith; it is more likely that participants are unaware of their bad behaviour than that they intentionally try to degrade the quality of the discussion. diff --git a/website/EN/codeofconduct.html b/website/EN/codeofconduct.html index 1080c5b9..bf164b70 100644 --- a/website/EN/codeofconduct.html +++ b/website/EN/codeofconduct.html @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ - + @@ -213,9 +213,17 @@ This applies to messages for help, too; not only is a public support request muc
-

In case of problems

+

No spamming

+Posting of adverts or other off-topic content in Matrix/XMPP or other public systems used by the project will be considered a violation of the code of conduct. +

+
+
+
+

In case of problems

+
+

While this code of conduct should be adhered to by participants, we recognize that sometimes people may have a bad day, or be unaware of some of the guidelines in this code of conduct. When that happens, you may reply to them and point out this code of conduct. Such messages may be in public or in private, whatever is most appropriate. However, regardless of whether the message is public or not, it should still adhere to the relevant parts of this code of conduct; in particular, it should not be abusive or disrespectful. Assume good faith; it is more likely that participants are unaware of their bad behaviour than that they intentionally try to degrade the quality of the discussion.