Documentation

This commit is contained in:
Bob Mottram 2015-03-02 13:50:36 +00:00
parent 526097028e
commit 4181356aa1
2 changed files with 8 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en">
<head>
<title></title>
<!-- 2014-12-17 Wed 20:47 -->
<!-- 2015-03-02 Mon 13:47 -->
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" />
<meta name="generator" content="Org-mode" />
<meta name="author" content="Bob Mottram" />
@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ Log into the system and become the root user, then run the <i>backup</i> command
<div class="org-src-container">
<pre class="src src-bash">su username@domainname -p 2222
<pre class="src src-bash">ssh username@domainname -p 2222
su
backup
</pre>
@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ Log into the system and become the root user, then run the <i>restore</i> comman
<div class="org-src-container">
<pre class="src src-bash">su username@domainname -p 2222
<pre class="src src-bash">ssh username@domainname -p 2222
su
restore
</pre>

View File

@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en">
<head>
<title></title>
<!-- 2015-01-23 Fri 21:20 -->
<!-- 2015-03-02 Mon 13:47 -->
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" />
<meta name="generator" content="Org-mode" />
<meta name="author" content="Bob Mottram" />
@ -217,6 +217,10 @@ Another problem is the precariousness of the terms of service. Except in rare ca
You can bypass all of these dilemmas and take back ownership of your internet content with Freedombone. Originally based upon the Beaglebone Black, Freedombone is a small and cheap home server which enables you to use email, have your own web site and do social networking without any built-in spying and without having to agree to any legal terms of service other than those of your ISP. It provides independence and security in an era where those things are in short supply.
</p>
<p>
Freedombone is an example of the internet as it was supposed to be: a network of peers, rather than a small number of gigantic server farms with everyone connecting to them. Even if they're well run, centralised server farms become a conspicuous target for <i>all kinds of nefariousness</i> and in any future wars they're bound to be amongst the first facilities to receive the "<i>shock and awe</i>" treatment. If a robust information society is desirable then excessive centralisation of control over information should be avoided.
</p>
<div class="center">
<div class="figure">