Code cleanup and fix for Bug #83, "ngIRCd chokes on 1-character messages" in
function Handle_Buffer(): the buffer is now correctly cleared when ngIRCd
receives 1-character messages terminated with either CR or LF (in violation
to RFC 2812, section 2.3 "Messages", 5th paragraph).
Modeless channels (+channels) are described in RFC 2811;
so my modifications to
530112b114
('Add support for modeless channels')
to disable +channels for --strict-rfc configurations
were wrong. This reverts those changes.
Add support for modeless channels (+channels).
[fw@strlen.de:
- integrate test cases
- don't support +channels when compiled with --strict-rfc
- do not set +o mode for channel creator
- force +nt mode when channel is created ]
When trying to part a channel ("PART #channel") the client is not member of
the daemon now correctly reports the numeric ERR_NOTONCHANNEL (442) insted
of ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL (403).
client.c:72:6: warning: symbol 'Max_Users' was not declared. Should it be static?
client.c:72:21: warning: symbol 'My_Max_Users' was not declared. Should it be static?
ngircd will exit if the config file cannot be opened. While
thats okay if ngircd starts up for the first time, it isn't
when we are re-reading the config file after a /REHASH or SIGHUP.
all references to struct sockaddr/in_addr have been
removed from src/ngircd.
libngipaddr (in src/ipaddr/) hides all the gory details.
See src/ipaddr/ng_ipaddr.h for API description.
This does hit only operators that join a channel with at least 2 servers active in the net
the server the oper connects to sends "channel^Go" to the other servers
the other server first searches for the channel and then strips the modes from the channel name
he has to do the other way round: first strip and then check the channel name.
RPL_WHOREPLY messages generated by IRC_WHO don't include flags (*,@,+)
that should appear according to this description:
http://www.mishscript.de/reference/rawhelp3.htm#raw352
Other IRC servers do include the flags.
Modify who-test.e to expose missing flags,
modify ngircd-test.conf to accommodate who-test.e, and fix
irc-info.c to correct these problems.
Under some circumstances ngIRCd currently issues a channel MODE message
with a trailing space after the last parameter, which isn't permitted by
the grammar in RFC 2812 section 2.3.1:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2812#section-2.3.1
The following patch modifies mode-test.e to expose this, and modifies
irc-mode.c to correct it.
- put sending of mode and forwarding of JOIN to other clients
into seperate function.
- put sending of topic/channel names into seperate function.
- put access check into seperate function.
- translate/remove remaining german comments.
- stop if JOIN to a channel in a list (JOIN #a,#,b,#c...) fails
(This doesn't change the behaviour: skip-to-next-channel-on-error
did never work as intended)
Dana Dahlstrom reported that IRC_WHO did not follow
RFC 2812, Section 3.6.1. Specifically:
- IRC_WHO did not send "G" flag instead if "H" if client was away
- did not search username/servername/hostname etc. if argument
was not a channel.
Fix all of the above and tidy things up a bit.
Also add IRC_WHO test script contributed by Dana.
The students in my software-engineering class are writing IRC clients in
Java, and I'm running ngIRCd as a sandbox for them to play in. We
noticed ngIRCd doesn't obey the "JOIN 0" command specified in RFC 2812:
JOIN 0 ; Leave all currently joined
channels.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2812#section-3.2.1
I believe the following patch addresses this. Cheers!
[fw@strlen.de: put it into a seperate function]
parse.c:56:9: warning: symbol 'My_Commands' was not declared. Should it be static?
parse.c:107:9: warning: symbol 'My_Numerics' was not declared. Should it be static?
Also move handling of numerics into a seperate helper function.
struct Conf_Server stored the ip address to connect to
in dotted-decimal notation; but we only need this for connect()
so long-time storage isn't necessary.
- New configuration option "MaxNickLength" to specify the allowed maximum
length of user nick names. Note: must be unique in an IRC network!
- Enhanced the IRC+ protocol to support an enhanced "server handshake" and
enable server to recognice numeric 005 (ISUPPORT) and 376 (ENDOFMOTD).
See doc/Protocol.txt for details.
to the users working directory (as returned by getpwuid()).
Failing to chdir to that directory isn't an error; so
log with LOG_INFO and prefix the message with "Notice".
Dana Dahlstrom