Some operating systems, for example OpenBSD, use "localhost.<domain>"
instead of "localhost", so the "who-test" expecting "localhost" failed
on such systems.
Brandon Beresini sent me a patch yesterday adding tests for JOIN under
various circumstances, which I believe he worked on with Bryan Caldwell
and Ali Shemiran. I made a few modifications; the result is below.
Add support for modeless channels (+channels).
[fw@strlen.de:
- integrate test cases
- don't support +channels when compiled with --strict-rfc
- do not set +o mode for channel creator
- force +nt mode when channel is created ]
The config file for ngircds test suite contained obsolete
ConfUID/ConfGID settings, causing ngircd to needlesly complain when
started as non-root (which is hopefully the _normal_ case...)
RPL_WHOREPLY messages generated by IRC_WHO don't include flags (*,@,+)
that should appear according to this description:
http://www.mishscript.de/reference/rawhelp3.htm#raw352
Other IRC servers do include the flags.
Modify who-test.e to expose missing flags,
modify ngircd-test.conf to accommodate who-test.e, and fix
irc-info.c to correct these problems.
Under some circumstances ngIRCd currently issues a channel MODE message
with a trailing space after the last parameter, which isn't permitted by
the grammar in RFC 2812 section 2.3.1:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2812#section-2.3.1
The following patch modifies mode-test.e to expose this, and modifies
irc-mode.c to correct it.
Dana Dahlstrom reported that IRC_WHO did not follow
RFC 2812, Section 3.6.1. Specifically:
- IRC_WHO did not send "G" flag instead if "H" if client was away
- did not search username/servername/hostname etc. if argument
was not a channel.
Fix all of the above and tidy things up a bit.
Also add IRC_WHO test script contributed by Dana.
The students in my software-engineering class are writing IRC clients in
Java, and I'm running ngIRCd as a sandbox for them to play in. We
noticed ngIRCd doesn't obey the "JOIN 0" command specified in RFC 2812:
JOIN 0 ; Leave all currently joined
channels.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2812#section-3.2.1
I believe the following patch addresses this. Cheers!
[fw@strlen.de: put it into a seperate function]
Alexander Barton