Note: The new debugging interface is starting to take shape. In general, I think it can be considered to be stable, with the exception of the in-memory message construction functions. However, there is still a lot of work to be done to polish things up and to convert the remaining fprintf. To make my life easier, please follow the guidelines described in this document. Read this document before writing new code. Also, DO NOT USE fprintf (or printf) to output things. All these will have to be translated to the new interface and there are already about 3000 of them! Also, instead of writing FIXMEs in the source, output a FIXME message if you can. But read on... 14 Mar 1998, Dimitrie O. Paun Debugging classes ----------------- There are 4 types (or classes) of debugging messages: FIXME -- Messages in this class relate to behavior of Wine that does not correspond to standard Windows behavior and that should be fixed. Examples: stubs, semi-implemented features, etc. ERR -- Messages in this class relate to serious errors in Wine. This sort of messages are close to asserts -- that is, you should output a error message when the code detects a condition which should not happen. Examples: unexpected change in internal state, etc. WARN -- These are warning messages. You should report a warning when something unwanted happen but the function behaves properly. That is, output a warning when you encounter something unexpected (ex: could not open a file) but the function deals correctly with the situation (that is, according to the docs). If you do not deal correctly with it, output a fixme. Examples: fail to access a resource required by the app, etc. TRACE -- These are detailed debugging messages that are mainly useful to debug a component. These are usually turned off. Examples: everything else that does not fall in one of the above mentioned categories and the user does not need to know about it. The user has the capability to turn on or off messages of a particular type. You can expect the following patterns of usage (but note that any combination is possible): -- when you debug a component, all types (TRACE,WARN,ERR,FIXME) will be enabled. -- during the pre-alpha (maybe alpha) stage of Wine, most likely the TRACE class will be disabled by default, but all others (WARN,ERR,FIXME) will be enabled by default. -- when Wine will become stable, most likely the TRACE and WARN classes will be disabled by default, but all ERRs and FIXMEs will be enabled. -- in some installations that want the smallest footprint and where the debug information is of no interest, all classes may be disabled by default. Of course, the user will have the runtime ability to override these defaults. However, this ability may be turned off and certain classes of messages may be completely disabled at compile time to reduce the size of Wine. Debugging channels ------------------ Also, we divide the debugging messages per component. Each component is assigned a debugging channel. The identifier of the channel must be a valid C identifier but note that it may also be a reserve word like int or static. Examples of debugging channels: reg, updown, string We will refer to a generic channel as xxx. Note: for those who know the old interface, the channel/type is what followed the _ in the dprintf_xxx statements. For example, to output a message on the debugging channel reg in the old interface you would have to write: dprintf_reg(stddeb, "Could not access key!\n"); In the new interface, we drop the stddeb as it is implicit. However, we add an orthogonal piece of information to the message: its class. This is very important as it will allow us to selectively turn on or off certain messages based on the type of information they report. For this reason it is VERY important to choose the right class for the message. Anyhow, suppose we figured that this message should belong in the WARN class, so in the new interface, you write: WARN(reg, "Could not access key!"); Notice the \n is no longer required. --- How to use it ------------- So, to output a message (class YYY) on channel xxx, do: #include "debug.h" .... YYY(xxx, "", ...); Some examples from the code: #include "debug.h" ... TRACE(crtdll, "CRTDLL_setbuf(file %p buf %p)", file, buf); WARN(aspi, "Error opening device errno=%d", save_error); If you need to declare a new debugging channel, use it in your code and then do: %tools/make_debug in the root directory of Wine. Note that this will result in almost complete recompilation of Wine. Notes: 1. Please pay attention to which class you assign the message. There are only 4 classes, so it is not hard. The reason it is important to get it right is that too much information is no information. For example, if you put things into the WARN class that should really be in the TRACE class, the output will be too big and this will force the user to turn warnings off. But this way he will fail to see the important ones. Also, if you put warnings into the TRACE class lets say, he will most likely miss those because usually the TRACE class is turned off. A similar argument can be made if you mix any other two classes. 2. All lines end by default with a newline. So you should not add one more. If you can NOT output everything that you want in the line with only one statement, then you need to build the string in memory. Please read the section below "In-memory messages" on the preferred way to do it. PLEASE USE THAT INTERFACE TO BUILD MESSAGES IN MEMORY. The reason is that we are not sure that we like it and having everything in one format will facilitate the (automatic) translation to a better interface. Are we debugging? ----------------- To test whether the debugging output of class yyy on channel xxx is enabled, use: TRACING to test if TRACE is enabled WARNING to test if WARN is enabled FIXMING to test if FIXME is enabled ERRING to test if ERR is enabled Examples: if(TRACING(atom)){ ...blah... } Note that you should normaly need to test only if TRACING. At present, none of the other 3 tests (except for ERRING which is used only once!) are used in Wine. In-memory messages ------------------ If you NEED to build the message from multiple calls, you need to build it in memory. To do that, you should use the following interface: - declare a string (where you are allowed to declare C variables) as follows: dbg_decl_str(name, len); where name is the name of the string (you should use the channel name on which you are going to output it) - print in it with: dsprintf(name, "", ...); which is just like a sprintf function but instead of a C string as first parameter it takes the name you used to declare it. - obtain a pointer to the string with: dbg_str(name) - reset the string (if you want to reuse it with): dbg_reset_str(name); Example (modified from the code): void some_func(tabs) { INT32 i; LPINT16 p = (LPINT16)tabs; dbg_decl_str(listbox, 256); /* declare the string */ for (i = 0; i < descr->nb_tabs; i++) { descr->tabs[i] = *p++<<1; if(TRACING(listbox)) /* write in it only if dsprintf(listbox, "%hd ", descr->tabs[i]); /* we are gonna output it */ } TRACE(listbox, "Listbox %04x: settabstops %s", wnd->hwndSelf, dbg_str(listbox)); /* output the whole thing */ } If you need to use it two times in the same scope do like this: void some_func(tabs) { INT32 i; LPINT16 p = (LPINT16)tabs; dbg_decl_str(listbox, 256); /* declare the string */ for (i = 0; i < descr->nb_tabs; i++) { descr->tabs[i] = *p++<<1; if(TRACING(listbox)) /* write in it only if dsprintf(listbox, "%hd ", descr->tabs[i]); /* we are gonna output it */ } TRACE(listbox, "Listbox %04x: settabstops %s\n", wnd->hwndSelf, dbg_str(listbox)); /* output the whole thing */ dbg_reset_str(listbox); /* !!!reset the string!!! */ for (i = 0; i < descr->extrainfo_nr; i++) { descr->extrainfo = *p+1; if(TRACING(listbox)) /* write in it only if dsprintf(listbox,"%3d ",descr->extrainfo); /* we are gonna output it */ } TRACE(listbox, "Listbox %04x: extrainfo %s\n", wnd->hwndSelf, dbg_str(listbox)); /* output the whole thing */ } IMPORTANT NOTE: As I already stated, I do not think this will be the ultimate interface for building in-memory debugging messages. In fact, I do have better ideas which I hope to have time to implement for the next release. For this reason, please try not to use it. However, if you need to output a line in more than one dprintf_xxx calls, then USE THIS INTERFACE. DO NOT use other methods. This way, I will easily translate everything to the new interface (when it will become available). So, if you need to use if, then follow the following guidelines: -- wrap calls to dsprintf with a if(YYY(xxx)) dsprintf(xxx,...); Of course, if the call to dsprintf is made from within a function which you know is called only if YYY(xxx) is true (say you call it only like this: if(YYY(xxx)) print_some_debug_info(); ) then you need not (and should not) wrap calls to dsprintf with the before mentioned if. -- name the string EXACTLY like the debugging channel on which is going to be output. Please see the above example. Resource identifiers -------------------- Resource identifiers can be either strings or numbers. To make life a bit easier for outputting this beasts (and to help you avoid the need to build the message in memory), I introduced a new function called: debugres The function is defined in debugstr.h and has the following prototype: LPSTR debugres(const void *id); It takes a pointer to the resource id and returns a nicely formatted string of the identifier. It the high word of the pointer is 0, then it assumes that the identifier is a number and thus returns a string of the form: #xxxx where xxxx are 4 hex-digits representing the low word of id. It the high word of the pointer is not 0, then it assumes that the identifier is a string and thus returns a string of the form: '' Thus, to use it, do something on the following lines: #include "debugstr.h" ... YYY(xxx, "resource is %s", debugres(myresource)); The -debugmsg command line option --------------------------------- So, the -debugmsg command line option has been changed as follows: - the new syntax is: -debugmsg [yyy]#xxx[,[yyy1]#xxx1]* where # is either + or - - when the optional class argument (yyy) is not present, then the statement will enable(+)/disable(-) all messages for the given channel (xxx) on all classes. For example: -debugmsg +reg,-file enables all messages on the reg channel and disables all messages on the file channel. This is same as the old semantics. - when the optional class argument (yyy) is present, then the statement will enable(+)/disable(-) messages for the given channel (xxx) only on the given class. For example: -debugmsg trace+reg,warn-file enables trace messages on the reg channel and disables warning messages on the file channel. - also, the pseudo-channel all is also supported and it has the intuitive semantics: -debugmsg +all -- enables all debug messages -debugmsg -all -- disables all debug messages -debugmsg yyy+all -- enables debug messages for class yyy on all channels. -debugmsg yyy-all -- disables debug messages for class yyy on all channels. So, for example: -debugmsg warn-all -- disables all warning messages. Also, note that at the moment: - the fixme and err classes are enabled by default - the trace and warn classes are disabled by default - there is no way to compile out the messages. All are runtime configurable. This will come next release.