Wine was not doing bounds checks for EM_GETTEXTRANGE, which was causing
a crash in Bug 17822. The added tests would cause a crash without the
added bounds checks in the richedit code.
The bounds checks I put in HandleMessage, since ME_GetTextRange is also
called for ME_GETSELTEXT which should not have bounds checks, since it
uses the selection range.
When the ME_GETTEXTRANGE message returns 0, no text is copied, not even
the NULL terminating charter. This differs from EM_GETSELTEXT which
will copy the NULL terminating character when no text is selected. This
behaviour is consistent with native richedit controls.
The width for EM_SETTARGETDEVICE is used by some applications to set the
wrapping width to a certain distance in twips. This can be used even
though the target device is ignored.
Using the WS_VSCROLL style causes the ES_AUTOVSCROLL option to be set,
and using the WS_HSCROLL style causes the ES_AUTOHSCROLL flag to be
set (except with richedit v1.0).
The contents of the text can be zoomed in with EM_SETZOOM, or with the
mouse wheel. EM_SETZOOM is implemented, but these tests show bugs in
the implementation, and zooming using the mouse wheel isn't
implemented at all yet.
This fixes inconsistencies shown in the tests I added for the
WM_GETDLGCODE. The tests covered different cases handled by the
current implementation in order to show that the native implementation
is simpler for all these cases.
The formatting rectangle is set with EM_SETRECT, and retrieved with
EM_GETRECT, so it corresponds to rcFormat in the code. This defines the
area that the richedit control should draw the text so that it is
offset by the top-left corner of the formatting rectangle, and clipped
so that it doesn't draw past the bottom or right hand side. Thus this
is important for implementing windowless richedit controls to not
interfere with the rest of the window.
EditWordBreakProc documented the third parameter as being the number
of unicode characters in the string for richedit 2.0 and up. It turns
out that it should actually be the number of bytes in the string.
For some reason EM_POSFROMCHAR was returning 0 when the position was
equal to the end of the text, or beyond the end of the text. Instead
it should use the position at the end of the text for both these
cases. The x value was also seen to be offset by 1 according to the
tests.
Previously the shortcuts for cut, copy, paste, undo, redo, and select
all were being handled during the WM_CHAR message. These tests show
that these shortcuts should be handled with the WM_KEYDOWN message
instead.
Francois Gouget