Cocoa does this automatically for non-owned windows and informs the back end
via a different mechanism (WINDOW_BROUGHT_FORWARD). However, for owned windows
(child windows in Cocoa parlance), Cocoa does not change their z-order relative
to the owner (parent) or sibling owned windows when clicked. So, we have to
move the window in user32's z-order so that it gets moved appropriately on
screen in response.
Signed-off-by: Ken Thomases <ken@codeweavers.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
Ideally, user32 would adjust its z-order for window activation as happens on
Windows. Then, the Mac driver would just reflect such changes in the Cocoa
windows. But user32 doesn't do that. SetActiveWindow() and SetForegroundWindow()
just adjust focus and status.
This is an attempt to achieve a similar result.
Signed-off-by: Ken Thomases <ken@codeweavers.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
Fixes a problem where the client area view would not be resized as the user
resizes the Cocoa window.
Signed-off-by: Ken Thomases <ken@codeweavers.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
With windows, the Cocoa main thread may have changed the frame and messages to
that effect may be in the queue, so it can be important to reassert the
"current" value and discard those messages. With views, by contrast, Cocoa
will never change the frame on its own and there are no messages to discard.
Signed-off-by: Ken Thomases <ken@codeweavers.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
The skipped code is a no-op for the child window case, except that the call to
set_window_surface() synchronizes with the main thread, even with null arguments.
Signed-off-by: Ken Thomases <ken@codeweavers.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
If another app grabbed the clipboard, that most likely happened while it was
active and the Wine process was inactive. Our process being made active again
is a good opportunity to check for that.
Signed-off-by: Ken Thomases <ken@codeweavers.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
This fixes an oversight in commit d91e56863. Some of the views created for
Win32 child windows were being left out of any view hierarchy. OpenGL contexts
attached to such child windows and views were not able to render to screen,
leaving blank areas.
Signed-off-by: Ken Thomases <ken@codeweavers.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
This should be a common case and will reduce the number of Cocoa views.
Signed-off-by: Ken Thomases <ken@codeweavers.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
This only really affects OpenGL child windows. GDI rendering to the window
surface is still only blitted to the window's content view. The descendant
views don't draw and so are transparent, letting the content view show through.
Using Cocoa views for child windows fixes a problem where changes to the
position and visibility of child GL windows didn't properly affect the Cocoa GL
view. Hiding, showing, and moving the top-level window affected the Cocoa
window and thus, indirectly, the GL view. Moving the child GL window itself
was propagated to the GL view, so that worked. But hiding, showing, or moving
any of the intervening ancestors of the child GL window didn't properly affect
the GL view. Neither did hiding or showing the child GL window itself.
This also slightly improves the clipping of the GL view by its ancestors,
although it still doesn't work quite right due to Cocoa bugs. There are also
remaining bugs with z-order among multiple GL views and clipping by overlapping
siblings. I hope to eventually fix those using Core Animation layers, for
which this is a prerequisite.
Signed-off-by: Ken Thomases <ken@codeweavers.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
Minor no-op refactoring that makes subsequent commits cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Ken Thomases <ken@codeweavers.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
When the display mode changes such that the screen height changes, we'd like
our windows to keep their position relative to the top-left of the primary
screen. That's how WinAPI's coordinate system works and we want the WinAPI
position of the window to not change just because the display mode changed.
Unfortunately that's not achievable in Cocoa. Cocoa keeps the window
stationary relative to the screen it's on, not necessarily the primary screen,
and it's sometimes relative to the bottom-left and sometimes the top-left of
that screen.
So, what we do instead is queue an event to get the back end to reassert the
WinAPI position of the window. This is queued before Cocoa can adjust the
Cocoa position of the window which would queue a WINDOW_FRAME_CHANGED to the
back end and mess up the WinAPI position. The back end's reassertion of the
WinAPI position won't be processed by the Cocoa thread until after Cocoa has
adjusted the position and will thus override it. It will also discard any
wrong WINDOW_FRAME_CHANGED that may have been queued.
Signed-off-by: Ken Thomases <ken@codeweavers.com>
OS X doesn't have the same concept of maximized windows as Windows does.
There's no mode that prevents a normally-resizable window from being resized.
If a window is "zoomed", it mostly fills the screen but the user can still
move or resize it, at which point it ceases to be in the zoomed state. So,
users are confused and frustrated when they can't resize a window that's
maximized.
To get similar behavior while still respecting Win32 semantics, we now let the
user try to resize maximized windows. (The resize cursors are shown at the
edges of the window frame.) When they start, a request is submitted to the app
to restore the window. Unless and until the window is restored, we don't
actually allow the window to change its size.
The user expects to resize the window from its current (maximized) position.
It should not jump to its normal position upon being restored. So, we set the
window's normal position to its current position before restoring it.
The Win32 window state might have changed while the event was in the queue,
making it obsolete. Sending WM_SYSCOMMAND/SC_RESTORE might re-show a hidden
window, for example.
The user is prevented from moving or resizing a maximized window. The zoom
button is still present and enabled for a maximized window but requests that
it be restored rather than simply resizing it, which is what it does for
normal windows.
If a window is not resizable (lacks WS_THICKFRAME) but has a maximize box
(WS_MAXIMIZEBOX), then the zoom button requests that it be maximized rather
than resizing it.
The window menu items are not updated as the window state changes; they only
update when the menu is shown. So the item state is not a reliable indicator
of whether minimization is allowed.
This simulates some of what would happen if user32 were managing the drag. The
click in the caption would cause WM_SYSCOMMAND/SC_MOVE. The processing of that
message is synchronous and doesn't return until the move is complete.
Some games require that "blocking" in the internal event loop to prevent them
from misbehaving during the drag.
Some programs minimize windows which are outside of the desktop. The Mac
driver had been leaving such windows ordered out, which prevented them from
minimizing and appearing on the Dock. That, in turn, made it difficult for
the user to restore them.
Queries can be run out of order because the main thread is waiting on the
response. The main thread didn't really need a response from QUERY_RESIZE_END.
It was only a query for symmetry with QUERY_RESIZE_START.
The Mac driver was already sending these events when the user resizes the
window by dragging its corner/edges, but there are other occasions when the
window frame changes. For example, when the user zooms the window.
Rémi Bernon