ReceiveTempSMS
/
Sweden-Number
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

ntdll/tests: Relax tests for RtlWaitOnAddress() timeout. 

RtlWaitOnAddress() shouldn't be waiting for less than 100 ms here, and it isn't,
but using GetTickCount() to measure this can result in up to 15 ms of error,
causing frequent test failures.

Signed-off-by: Zebediah Figura <z.figura12@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
This commit is contained in:
Zebediah Figura 2021-06-17 11:48:41 -05:00 committed by Alexandre Julliard
parent 9689e38a15
commit c82c5e96a9
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
dlls/ntdll/tests/om.c
View File

@ -2304,7 +2304,7 @@ static void test_wait_on_address(void)
status = pRtlWaitOnAddress(&address, &compare, 8, &timeout);
ticks = GetTickCount() - ticks;
ok(status == STATUS_TIMEOUT, "got 0x%08x\n", status);
ok(ticks >= 90 && ticks <= 1000, "got %u\n", ticks);
ok(ticks >= 80 && ticks <= 1000, "got %u\n", ticks);
ok(address == 0, "got %s\n", wine_dbgstr_longlong(address));
ok(compare == 0, "got %s\n", wine_dbgstr_longlong(compare));
@ -2319,7 +2319,7 @@ static void test_wait_on_address(void)
status = pRtlWaitOnAddress(&address, &compare, size, &timeout);
ticks = GetTickCount() - ticks;
ok(status == STATUS_TIMEOUT, "got 0x%08x\n", status);
ok(ticks >= 90 && ticks <= 1000, "got %u\n", ticks);
ok(ticks >= 80 && ticks <= 1000, "got %u\n", ticks);
status = pRtlWaitOnAddress(&address, &compare, size << 1, &timeout);
ok(!status, "got 0x%08x\n", status);