From b46f1686505c26145ab5f81df432cc83fefee862 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rob Shearman Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:48:58 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] rpcrt4: Don't test for a specific value for fBufferValid in test_client_init. It's not consistent across different Windows versions. --- dlls/rpcrt4/tests/ndr_marshall.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/dlls/rpcrt4/tests/ndr_marshall.c b/dlls/rpcrt4/tests/ndr_marshall.c index 83a80d92f1c..5356c43a7bb 100644 --- a/dlls/rpcrt4/tests/ndr_marshall.c +++ b/dlls/rpcrt4/tests/ndr_marshall.c @@ -1196,7 +1196,7 @@ static void test_client_init(void) stubMsg.fIsOut == -1, /* XP-SP3 */ "fIsOut should have been set to 0 or -1 instead of %d\n", stubMsg.fIsOut); TEST_ZERO(fIsOicf, "%d"); - TEST_ZERO(fBufferValid, "%d"); + trace("NdrClientInitializeNew: fBufferValid = %d\n", stubMsg.fBufferValid); ok(stubMsg.fHasMemoryValidateCallback == 0 || stubMsg.fHasMemoryValidateCallback == -1, /* XP-SP3 */ "fHasMemoryValidateCallback should have been set to 0 or -1 instead of %d\n", stubMsg.fHasMemoryValidateCallback); @@ -1313,7 +1313,7 @@ todo_wine stubMsg.fIsOut == -1, /* XP-SP3 */ "fIsOut should have been set to 0 or -1 instead of %d\n", stubMsg.fIsOut); TEST_ZERO(fIsOicf, "%d"); - trace("fBufferValid = %d\n", stubMsg.fBufferValid); + trace("NdrServerInitializeNew: fBufferValid = %d\n", stubMsg.fBufferValid); ok(stubMsg.fHasMemoryValidateCallback == 0 || stubMsg.fHasMemoryValidateCallback == -1, /* XP-SP3 */ "fHasMemoryValidateCallback should have been set to 0 or -1 instead of %d\n", stubMsg.fHasMemoryValidateCallback);