From 9858e235d269a8f630830e3b435ae29d4b34c8bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry@codeweavers.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 20:18:20 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] A decision whether add SWP_NOACTIVATE or not should be based
 on GetActiveWindow() test.

---
 dlls/x11drv/winpos.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/dlls/x11drv/winpos.c b/dlls/x11drv/winpos.c
index 3e65aaf235d..440ab3eb273 100644
--- a/dlls/x11drv/winpos.c
+++ b/dlls/x11drv/winpos.c
@@ -755,7 +755,7 @@ static BOOL fixup_flags( WINDOWPOS *winpos )
     if ((wndPtr->rectWindow.left == winpos->x) && (wndPtr->rectWindow.top == winpos->y))
         winpos->flags |= SWP_NOMOVE;    /* Already the right position */
 
-    if (winpos->hwnd == GetForegroundWindow())
+    if (winpos->hwnd == GetActiveWindow())
         winpos->flags |= SWP_NOACTIVATE;   /* Already active */
     else if ((wndPtr->dwStyle & (WS_POPUP | WS_CHILD)) != WS_CHILD)
     {