From 64b7359265ba2a386d2864504fd2b61bcdcc6249 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Stefaniuc Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 01:14:24 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] user32/tests: Pass HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY to HeapAlloc() instead of clearing the memory with a separate memset() call. --- dlls/user32/tests/listbox.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/dlls/user32/tests/listbox.c b/dlls/user32/tests/listbox.c index 529e2c001e1..9829bd5c06d 100644 --- a/dlls/user32/tests/listbox.c +++ b/dlls/user32/tests/listbox.c @@ -168,13 +168,11 @@ check (const struct listbox_test test) WCHAR *txtw; int resA, resW; - txt = HeapAlloc (GetProcessHeap(), 0, size+1); - memset(txt, 0, size+1); + txt = HeapAlloc (GetProcessHeap(), HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY, size+1); resA=SendMessageA(hLB, LB_GETTEXT, i, (LPARAM)txt); ok(!strcmp (txt, strings[i]), "returned string for item %d does not match %s vs %s\n", i, txt, strings[i]); - txtw = HeapAlloc (GetProcessHeap(), 0, 2*size+2); - memset(txtw, 0, 2*size+2); + txtw = HeapAlloc (GetProcessHeap(), HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY, 2*size+2); resW=SendMessageW(hLB, LB_GETTEXT, i, (LPARAM)txtw); if (resA != resW) { trace("SendMessageW(LB_GETTEXT) not supported on this platform (resA=%d resW=%d), skipping...\n",