rbtree: Clarify the loop conditions to avoid confusing older gcc.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0ad8bb4ecf
commit
5d01ebab89
|
@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static inline struct wine_rb_entry *wine_rb_postorder_next(struct wine_rb_entry
|
|||
/* iterate through the tree using a tree entry */
|
||||
#define WINE_RB_FOR_EACH_ENTRY(elem, tree, type, field) \
|
||||
for ((elem) = WINE_RB_ENTRY_VALUE(wine_rb_head((tree)->root), type, field); \
|
||||
&(elem)->field; \
|
||||
(elem) != WINE_RB_ENTRY_VALUE(0, type, field); \
|
||||
(elem) = WINE_RB_ENTRY_VALUE(wine_rb_next(&elem->field), type, field))
|
||||
|
||||
/* iterate through the tree using using postorder, making it safe to free the entry */
|
||||
|
@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static inline struct wine_rb_entry *wine_rb_postorder_next(struct wine_rb_entry
|
|||
/* iterate through the tree using a tree entry and postorder, making it safe to free the entry */
|
||||
#define WINE_RB_FOR_EACH_ENTRY_DESTRUCTOR(elem, elem2, tree, type, field) \
|
||||
for ((elem) = WINE_RB_ENTRY_VALUE(wine_rb_postorder_head((tree)->root), type, field); \
|
||||
&(elem)->field \
|
||||
(elem) != WINE_RB_ENTRY_VALUE(0, type, field) \
|
||||
&& (((elem2) = WINE_RB_ENTRY_VALUE(wine_rb_postorder_next(&(elem)->field), type, field)) || 1); \
|
||||
(elem) = (elem2))
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue