user32/tests: Make the test_PeekMessage3 timer fire less often.
On Windows it sometimes fires again before we get the expected WM_USER message and/or before the end of the test where we don't expect any more message. We cannot fire it only once because Wine doesn't pass the tests yet and it would block otherwise, but fire it less often helps the test to pass on Windows. Signed-off-by: Rémi Bernon <rbernon@codeweavers.com> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1450924e59
commit
19c107335e
|
@ -12420,7 +12420,7 @@ static void test_PeekMessage3(void)
|
|||
/* GetMessage() and PeekMessage(..., PM_REMOVE) should prefer messages which
|
||||
* were already seen. */
|
||||
|
||||
SetTimer(hwnd, 1, 0, NULL);
|
||||
SetTimer(hwnd, 1, 100, NULL);
|
||||
while (!PeekMessageA(&msg, NULL, 0, 0, PM_NOREMOVE));
|
||||
ok(msg.message == WM_TIMER, "msg.message = %u instead of WM_TIMER\n", msg.message);
|
||||
PostMessageA(hwnd, WM_USER, 0, 0);
|
||||
|
@ -12436,7 +12436,7 @@ static void test_PeekMessage3(void)
|
|||
ret = PeekMessageA(&msg, NULL, 0, 0, 0);
|
||||
ok(!ret, "expected PeekMessage to return FALSE, got %u\n", ret);
|
||||
|
||||
SetTimer(hwnd, 1, 0, NULL);
|
||||
SetTimer(hwnd, 1, 100, NULL);
|
||||
while (!PeekMessageA(&msg, NULL, 0, 0, PM_NOREMOVE));
|
||||
ok(msg.message == WM_TIMER, "msg.message = %u instead of WM_TIMER\n", msg.message);
|
||||
PostMessageA(hwnd, WM_USER, 0, 0);
|
||||
|
@ -12451,7 +12451,7 @@ static void test_PeekMessage3(void)
|
|||
|
||||
/* It doesn't matter if a message range is specified or not. */
|
||||
|
||||
SetTimer(hwnd, 1, 0, NULL);
|
||||
SetTimer(hwnd, 1, 100, NULL);
|
||||
while (!PeekMessageA(&msg, NULL, WM_TIMER, WM_TIMER, PM_NOREMOVE));
|
||||
ok(msg.message == WM_TIMER, "msg.message = %u instead of WM_TIMER\n", msg.message);
|
||||
PostMessageA(hwnd, WM_USER, 0, 0);
|
||||
|
@ -12467,7 +12467,7 @@ static void test_PeekMessage3(void)
|
|||
/* But not if the post messages were added before the PeekMessage() call. */
|
||||
|
||||
PostMessageA(hwnd, WM_USER, 0, 0);
|
||||
SetTimer(hwnd, 1, 0, NULL);
|
||||
SetTimer(hwnd, 1, 100, NULL);
|
||||
while (!PeekMessageA(&msg, NULL, WM_TIMER, WM_TIMER, PM_NOREMOVE));
|
||||
ok(msg.message == WM_TIMER, "msg.message = %u instead of WM_TIMER\n", msg.message);
|
||||
ret = GetMessageA(&msg, NULL, 0, 0);
|
||||
|
@ -12480,7 +12480,7 @@ static void test_PeekMessage3(void)
|
|||
/* More complicated test with multiple messages. */
|
||||
|
||||
PostMessageA(hwnd, WM_USER, 0, 0);
|
||||
SetTimer(hwnd, 1, 0, NULL);
|
||||
SetTimer(hwnd, 1, 100, NULL);
|
||||
while (!PeekMessageA(&msg, NULL, WM_TIMER, WM_TIMER, PM_NOREMOVE));
|
||||
ok(msg.message == WM_TIMER, "msg.message = %u instead of WM_TIMER\n", msg.message);
|
||||
PostMessageA(hwnd, WM_USER + 1, 0, 0);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue